|
|
Project Impact Assessment Report
CVD Community Development and Education/Awareness activities in Samlaut and Pailin regions.
First Semester of fiscal year 2005
By Laurence Desvignes - CVD/MJP-CD Advisor
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A total of 12 villages were visited, including 9 where community development (CD) and education
activities have already been implemented or initiated, and 4 where community surveys were
conducted for CD/education to be implemented.
A. Perception of CVD/MJP community development activities by the villagers:
- People who have received CVD/MJP assistance have been selected because they were conducting
activities in the forest. Once selected, the families were organized into Self Help Groups
(SHG) to find out the needs of the targeted families.
- Targeted villagers and village/commune leaders in general are satisfied with the CD activities
as they think they have contributed to improve living standards of the concerned villagers and
of the village as a whole.
- In certain villages, the assistance distributed is not considered sufficient to stop illegal
activities.
- A large proportion of people targeted with assistance is said to have stopped or reduced their
activities in the PA. It was however clearly stated that people could not stop at once their
illegal activities and admitted to need time to be able to stop definitively those activities.
They are in a process of progressively decreasing illegal activities.
Comments:
Continued support must be considered to ensure that those people are not going to resume illegal
activities. This can be achieved through the monitoring of CD activities implemented by CVD.
Action to be taken following the workshop:
CVD teams were restructured into a 3-member team including one education, one CD and one monitoring
team members.
B. Type of assistance needed
The various villages requested different type of assistance which has been compiled as follows:
- Agriculture/farming/forestry assistance: agricultural tools, food support, seeds, assistance
to buy land, tree nursery.
- Animal husbandry: cows, chicken. None of the villages visited wanted pigs - they require too
much food and water and are seen as not profitable.
- Infrastructures: school, road access, water sources e.g. wells and ponds.
- Training/skills: vocational training, technical assistance e.g. for reforestation.
- Financial assistance through small credit (2-3000 B per family), various jobs where they could
work as labour.
Comments:
The type of assistance needed depends on each village. As such, the approach has to remain flexible.
The budget must reflect this and budget lines should not be too specific to allow unplanned activities
to take place.
Action to be taken:
A budget review will take place on February 22nd, once the 2005 strategy will have been reviewed as
well (on February 23rd).
C. Education
- Environmental education and awareness are seen as an important element of the conservation
activities by the villagers and leaders.
- All groups should be targeted to understand the value of the protected areas and the negative
effects of logging/poaching.
- Capacity building of teachers, respected people etc. and involvement of local authorities are
keys to the protection of the forest.
- Education should be implemented on an ongoing basis and not as a one-off e.g. once a month or
every two months.
- Environmental law should be included to inform a person that working in PA is against the law.
- Education activities should be implemented at the same time as the CD activities are established.
- Education materials needed to help people remember the main messages e.g. notebooks, pens,
documents, billboards.
- Environmental lessons are already given by teachers from Grade 6 up.
Comments:
The education component has been working in the villages but has not been targeting all groups within
the villages, for various reasons, including a timing factor. Although the work carried out by the
team members has been valued by the villagers, it needs to focus on a closer integration with the
community development team as well.
New issues, such as environmental law, must also be included in the curriculum.
Capacity building of certain groups within the villages must be considered.
Education should be implemented on a regular basis, as requested by villagers.
Action to be taken:
Following the workshop, CVD agreed with the relevant Departments to review the curriculum and to
include environmental law.
The 3-member teams will allow education and community development activities to be integrated and
followed up by the monitoring staff member.
A meeting with the Ministry of Education should be established to verify whether the training of
teachers is possible and what the schools are already teaching regarding environmental issues.
An education mobile team will be set up to respond to the education needs of the communities.
D. Monitoring/law enforcement
- According to villagers and village/commune leaders, rangers’ patrols should be conducted with
the local authorities and more collaboration and communication should be implemented between
the rangers and the villagers.
- Commune and village leaders have said being able to help protect the forest if they are involved
and informed on what is going on and what are the problems encounter by rangers while patrolling.
- In certain villages, mechanisms have been implemented by village/commune leaders so that villagers
must ask the authorisation from the village/commune leaders to cut any tree. This mechanism allows
for a controlled logging and is not seen by the leaders as the ideal solution - however, they have
highlighted that until the living conditions be raised in their villages, the Village Development
Committee can not totally forbid people from carrying out this type of activities, the idea being
to do so in a controlled manner.
- In some villages, community forestry has been initiated and the village has appointed its own
rangers.
- In certain villages, the boundaries of PA are not clearly identified - coordination with rangers
must take place so that boundaries can be clearly marked.
- One major problem highlighted by villagers is that poachers/loggers are coming from other provinces.
- Animals (or tracks of) have been seen by villagers: elephants, gaur, tiger, banteng.
Comments:
More interaction and integration between monitoring/LE teams and CVD teams and respective activities are
needed. The involvement of communities and community leaders is a key to the good implementation of MJP
activities. Can and should MJP/CVD staff members be involved in collecting information from villagers
about wildlife they have encountered (to be checked with John/Kerryn)?
Action to be taken:
All MJP staff members to be moved into the same location in both Pailin and Samlaut for a better
cooperation and communication.
Regarding the involvement of communities and community leaders, the restructuring of the CVD/MJP team
should allow for a better cooperation with villagers and local authorities.
MINUTE OF MEETINGS
Anlong Puk village, Samlaut
CVD activities helped people to decrease logging and hunting. They received seeds, agricultural tools,
cows etc.
No environmental education was received in this part of the village but interviewees (village leader
and SHG member) think it is important to understand about the environment.
People who received assistance were selected because they were going into the PA to survive e.g. the
woman interviewed is poor, a widow with three kids at school and was collecting fruits from trees in
the forest. She says being in a better situation now and she can stay at home rather than going to the
forest.
A pile of wood in the village leader’s house - bought from the road...
It is estimated by the village leader that 70% of the people who received MJP CD assistance have stopped
cutting wood and hunting. They are still using their chainsaws for cutting trees in the farming areas.
People who haven’t received assistance still need to receive some.
Generally, it is now easier for the whole village than it was before CD activities took place.
Other CVD programmes were implemented by other project staff members in this village e.g. emergency aid
(blanket, rice, mosquito net etc.).
Kantout village, Samlaut
SHG members were selected as they were the ones performing illegal activities i.e. cutting trees, hunting,
making traps. They are now going into non-protected areas for hunting and cutting trees with commune
authorisation.
Trees were planted near the village and micro-credits were distributed. The village is better off now than
what it was before, since assistance was distributed.
Education was received once and people understood well the message. Children did not receive any in primary
school. In pre-school, they received a story book.
Beng Run village, Samlaut (800 families)
Improvements in the village since assistance was distributed: infrastructure, education materials and
awareness, improved living standards, SHG, support to poor families (farming, 26 cows etc.), activities
developed to protect area and provide alternative livelihoods. CVD activities reached their goal.
95% of the population is happy with the plans to protect the forest. There is a good cooperation between
rangers and authorities/communities from the top level to the commune level. Logging is being carried out
by people outside the commune. Rangers should patrol with local authorities and on a regular basis, not
from time to time.
People have changed activities since CVD support but environmental education should be increased as well
as support to vulnerable people.
People poaching and logging were targeted and received agricultural tools, cows and seeds. People do not
poach anymore. The commune leader doesn’t allow them to do so anymore.
Education should be conducted for everybody. People in this commune need to understand the value of the
PA. Education could be done through building the capacity of teachers, gathering people in one place. The
materials distributed help people to keep informed. Videos about the negative impact of cutting trees and
about other protected areas would be useful.
Rangers patrol with their own team and there is no cooperation with the local authorities. Rangers should
inform the commune/district leaders about what they have found and what they did. It would be better to be
informed. An improved communication and cooperation is needed.
Key people at district level should know what is going on in their area, what happened and could then
helped out to sort any problems and stop people from conducting illegal activities.
People encroaching the land are coming from other provinces. Top level instances should have a meeting and
sort out the problem. At commune level, he can’t do anything.
Beng Run village, Group 2
Hunters, people collecting fruits and wood in the forest were selected as beneficiaries of CVD assistance.
One hunter was interviewed and said he stopped hunting after receiving 21 kg of soybean seeds (he harvested
1 ton). His living conditions have been improved and he doesn’t need to hunt or cut trees anymore.
People understand why the area needs to be protected. Since CVD/MJP assistance was received, it is possible
to have a decent livelihood, as opposed to hunting activities.
Only about 1 out of 4 people received environmental education, which is not sufficient. The interviewee said
he attended an interesting session about the impact of destroying the forest i.e. the environmental changes
will cause heavy rains etc. They need to learn more. One session per month or every 2 months.
CVD assistance is important as if we continue to destroy the forest, there will be no tree and no wildlife
for the next generation and the whole environment will change.
Chhak Roka village (newly surveyed village)
20-30 families have their land in the PA (they had the land before it became a protected area) and DoE
informed them not to encroach the land.
Hunters have decreased their activities since DoE is engaged in wildlife protection and they are farming
instead.
6 or 7 families are still using chainsaws occasionally in PA to collect rattan.
It is important to inform people that activities in the PA are against the law and that they can earn
30,000 Baths per harvest if they farm (2 harvests a year are possible as the soil is good for farming and
growing vegetables).
Other solutions to prevent people from going into PA are to educate them and organise vocational training,
to increase living standards, to implement law enforcement (to burn the chainsaw and establish a contract),
to distribute agricultural tools, food support and to compensate for chainsaw destruction. A contract should
be established between villagers and MJP: if they receive assistance, they should stop going into PA. If
they breach the contract, assistance should stop.
Environment education should take place at the same time as assistance is implemented.
Tanon village
To cut trees, people must ask the permission from the village leader. He is still allowing the cutting of the
trees in a controlled way because the village development committee can not totally forbid villagers to cut
trees because of living conditions.
People are not clear about the PA boundaries and they are cutting trees and poaching but they are not sure of
whether it is within PA boundaries or not.
Bar Huy Khmen Tboung village
Wives of SHG members were interviewed. They have been farming now instead of hunting and logging, since CVD
came in. They were not clear about the exact boundaries of the PA but the DoE installed some marking.
Mostly men attended education sessions but all people must understand the importance of PA and the negative
effects which would be caused by its destruction.
Thmey village
3 SHG and 23 beneficiary families selected as they were cutting trees as one of their main activity. The SHG
members admitted not having entirely stopped their illegal activities but they have reduced as they have
started farming. They estimate that they will need two more years before they can definitively stop. Also the
assistance they have received is not sufficient (5 kg seeds). 13-14 families are still missing land and it is
a problem as they can not farm. They would need to buy land to be able to farm as they could get more income
from farming than from hunting. There is no other job in the area otherwise they could give up poaching.
CVD CD activities have helped out but are not sufficient - they were not given enough seeds. People have garden
but need rice fields as well. Beside the production was low this year due to the lack of rain.
1 ha cost around 750 USD in this area (30,000 BATHS) and 5 ha are needed for a family of 6. But it is difficult
to find some land in this area - only small surfaces are available but are not sufficient to support a family.
Some families borrowed money from business men to buy seeds so they have to reimburse them with high interests
(2800 B per group and per month, twice a year. Interest rate is between 100 - 200 B per month for 1000 B borrowed
= 20% interest per month compared to 0.25% interest with CVD credit system).
They need more seeds, cows, small-credit or to be hired as labour etc. They do not want pigs as it is like
feeding another child.
50% of SHG members have changed activities but some are still poaching as they don’t have land or not enough
land (however, they said that they were collecting trees which have already been cut and not cutting new ones).
They have received education, which was important as it helped them to understand the value of the PA and of
the trees (i.e. if there is no tree, there is no rain and no national resources and it will affect the next
generations).
Support documents e.g. pens, notebooks, billboards etc. are needed to help people remember the messages - most
people have already forgotten about what was said to them.
Teacher training might be difficult to implement as teachers are already very busy. Beside, environmental issues
are being taught in grade 6 and up.
Toul Kieu village (newly surveyed village)
A list of poachers was already produced by the village (their main occupation is to cut trees, including digging
the roots out to sell them). People are entering the PA to collect rattan and old wood or to hunt. More than half
of the 45 families of the village go into the PA. This is one of the poorest villages in the area and people have
no other alternative. 50% of the villagers have land near the PA. People came for gem mining and then decided to
stay but as they did not have land, they encroached land within the PA.
Other occupations are charcoal making and bamboo collecting. People can not rely on farming alone as the land is
too small.
To prevent logging and poaching, the village would need cows, rice, agricultural tools, seeds, chicken and to be
hired as labour. The villagers do not want pigs as they eat too much and sell at a cheap price.
Education is seen as very important for people to understand the importance of wildlife. More education is also
essential as people tend to forget if there is only one session. Even if they are poor, it is important that they
learn more, in the village but also in schools.
Dey Krohome village
SHG members were met. They said having changed and stopped completely hunting and logging activities but more
assistance is needed such as seed, tool, water source. (At the moment they are collecting water 400 m away and the
source is already almost dry at that time of the year.)
- 30 m wells are needed
- Loan to cultivate vegetables etc. So far 2000 B per group (200 B per member) have been received and more
credit is needed
- more education is needed (they received it but only once), maybe once a month
- assistance to buy land as some villagers do not have land and others have but not enough
There is a problem with people coming from other provinces (e.g. Kompong Cham and Pursat mainly but also
Battambang, Takeo) to encroach land. They stay with relatives or settle on the encroached land.
There were not many improvements since they received assistance. More is needed.
Some animals (or tracks of) were seen by the villagers: elephants, gaur, tiger, banteng.
Opres village
"If we received more assistance, we could stop going into the forest." The villagers want to establish a tree
nursery e.g. fruit trees to plant trees in the village and distribute them around. They have enough land and
will set up a committee to take care of the nursery. They would also need technical assistance.
Villagers ask whether we could discuss with the rangers and ask them to return the logs they had confiscated.
The trees have been cut already and the villagers were not allowed to remove them. It was explained that it was
not possible as the rangers were implementing the law.
As the villagers are not allowed to go into the PA anymore, some families are getting poorer. Assistance was
distributed but it will take time before they can live from it i.e. the cow bank takes time, half of the seeds
were wasted as it was too dry.
One of the priority for the villagers is to dig a well (25-30 m) or a pond.
The priorities for the village are water, trees and loans. If this is implemented, then they will be able to
decrease their activities in the PA.
95% of villagers stopped going into the PA. They only collect wood for charcoal but in few more years, there
will be no more wood for charcoal.
The villagers do not need pigs as they required too much water. Chicken are OK but they need vaccination.
The village is however better off than before but needs more assistance.
The villagers attended environmental education sessions twice already but they think the education team
should come back at least 2-3 times.
Tchap Leu village
The village is located 6400 m from the main road (the entire forest has been cut along this road) and has 77
families (345 people). The village leader organised a meeting with each family and ask them to sign an agreement
not to go into the PA.
30% more land is needed however for the villagers. He will inform the Governor to find a solution.
The villagers want to plant fruit trees to sell fruits on the market. But they need to know what kind of trees
they can re-plant in this area. They need technical assistance and the villagers also need more support to improve
their livelihood e.g. tools, seeds etc. They need to finish the school, they need a well and road repair. They
will use the land for corn, soybean, mongbean but they need enough water. Until now, they did not have sufficient
food and had to eat roots of trees. Some have borrowed money from the bank and are worried about reimbursing the
bank as the weather has not been good for the crops.
Two proposals were submitted to CVD for the bridge repair and for the school.
They claim that rangers came to destroy equipment outside the PA.
The villagers are open to receive more education on the environment.
Krotchop Krahom village
Three SHG were formed two weeks before the visit took place.
OXFAM have been supporting community forestry activities in this village for the past 3 years. Village rangers
(3 groups of 5 volunteers) are monitoring 200 ha of forest nearby the village (out of the PA). OXFAM has been
providing the capacity building and the villagers are providing the protection system of the forest which belongs
to the community and is recognised as such by the Governor. The village cooperates with the Department of Forestry
who is taking action against people going into the forest.
Regular meetings are organised by OXFAM in PNP (Phnom Penh) with representatives of 24 districts involved in
community forestry.
Villagers were taught about the type of trees which should be re-planted without affecting the environment/soil.
A local NGO (border development) based in Pailin, is facilitating the work with the DoF, the other NGOs and the
community.
The villagers do not cut trees anymore now that they have gardens and are being hired to work. They need fruit
trees.
SHG members and local authorities have received education but not the rest of the village. They need more
environmental education as well as education on human rights, gender etc.
|
|
Back
    Home
|
|